Aesthetic Realism Is True about Our Lives

Learning about Oneself & the World

Nancy Huntting on a road trip along the Hudson River on the Jersey side
Looking at Hudson River wetlands

I grew up in Ohio near Cincinnati, and after college moved to New York City, where I first attended an Aesthetic Realism seminar.  What the speakers said about art and lifewhat they’d learned and how it changed their own liveswas thrilling. On this site is some of what I’ve learned through studying Aesthetic Realism in consultations and in classes I had the honor to attend with poet and critic Eli Siegel, its founder, and with Chair of Education Ellen Reiss.

Aesthetic Realism enabled me to be more the person I hoped to be, freer, happier, kinder, more intelligent. My opinion, very carefully come to, is that it’s  the knowledge most needed by the world. Studying it, testing its principles, makes for ever-increasing respect for the world and for people in all their diversity. 

What Is Aesthetic Realism?

Aesthetic Realism was founded in 1941 by the great American poet and critic Eli Siegel. He stated these principles as its basis:

1.  The deepest desire of every person is to like the world on an honest or accurate basis.

2.  The greatest danger for a person is to have contempt for the world and what is in it….Contempt can be defined as the lessening of what is different from oneself as a means of self-increase as one sees it.

3.  All beauty is a making one of opposites, and the making one of opposites is what we are going after in ourselves.

It was through studying these principles that I became a much kinder and more useful person. My best possibilities are brought forth, encouraged, strengthened. I believe everyone deserves to know and study Aesthetic Realism, and that the world urgently needs this universally true education. I recommend Self and World: An Explanation of Aesthetic Realism, and many other works about Aesthetic Realism in the Online Library

Many of the articles I’ve written and presented publicly in Aesthetic Realism seminars are published here. They’re about my life, questions I heard and things I learned that enabled me to change, as well as about notable women of the past, and in literature and film, and ways they  provide evidence of the universal value of Aesthetic Realism.


Featuredon the 60th Anniversary of the Beatles arrival in the USA:

The Beatles: Ringo Starr, Paul McCartney, John Lennon, George Harrison

Love Is Intimate & Wide in the Beatles’ “I Saw Her Standing There” – An Aesthetic Realism Music Seminar paper by Lynette Abel


A Major New Website!

oil on canvas (detail)
Dorothy Koppelman, Blue Plane Crash

The Chaim and Dorothy Koppelman Foundation website presents many art works by Chaim Koppelman (1920-2009) and painter and founding director of the Terrain Gallery, Dorothy Koppelman (1920-2017); and a selection of their writings on Picasso, Pollock, Matisse, Magritte, Van Gogh, Saint-Gaudens, Munch, Velazquez, Hogarth, and morebased on their study with the great American poet, critic, and philosopher Eli Siegel.

TRO: Money, Justice, & Relation

The Right of Aesthetic Realism to Be Known (TRO) is published every two weeks. Issue #2125 begins serialization of Economics Is Diverse by Eli Siegel, one of his Goodbye Profit System lectures, a landmark series begun in 1970. And Ellen Reiss writes in her commentary:

“In his economics lectures, Mr. Siegel used wide-ranging evidence from history, literature, and the events of the time. He showed that the most important question for economics and humanity is What does a person deserve by being a person? And he showed that our economy would fare well only if people (including economists) were trying honestly to answer that question. This is so, more intensely than ever, today..”  read more

Reprinted from the Santa Cruz Sentinel

A home should be an inalienable right

By Nancy Huntting
Reprinted from the Santa Cruz Sentinel of June 18, 2000, Santa Cruz, California, USA:

I just read “Middle-class buyers qualify for subsidies” (Sentinel, June 11) and also “Furious Debate Rages on Sleeping in Public,” (New York Times 5/28) which tells of  Santa Cruz as well as other cities across the country having hundreds, sometimes thousands of men, women, and children who don’t have a place to sleep at night. More and more Americans cannot afford rent. The National Coalition for the Homeless reports that homelessness has doubled and even tripled in the last two decades. That people are homeless in the United States of America is a horror, an outrage—and I respect every person working to have this horror end.

The Sentinel article said “homelessness looms even for those with jobs,” telling of a single parent of two children, working full time, who “the region’s housing crisis has left… homeless for four months.” The Times article tells that in the safe sleeping zones just voted on by the [Santa Cruz] City Council “structures, tents, or other camping accessories like stoves would …be illegal. People would not be allowed within 300 feet of any home. And after three nights… would have to move to another spot at least 500 feet away.” Every man, woman, and child who has to lay his or head down on a sidewalk is flesh and blood, has a mind, feelings, hopes and fears that are real; each has possibilities that are being stifled. And when you lose a job, or work long hours and still can’t make ends meet, you not only are not free, you are also in great danger. The Times article says, “recent studies showed that homeless people are 4 to 12 times more likely than housed people to be the victims of attacks.”

Meanwhile, what these articles don’t deal with is the reason why, in a land so wealthy, in an economy supposedly doing so well, there are thousands of people—many of them families with young children—without a basic necessity of life, a home!

I want your readers to know there is an answer. It was given by the American economist and critic Eli Siegel, the founder of the education Aesthetic Realism. He is the person who had the greatest knowledge of history and the greatest compassion for people. He said that any economy in which one child is hungry is a failure. He showed, beginning in 1970, that our economic system, in which a few owners and stockholders make profit from the labor and life needs of others, had irreparably failed, would never recover; the contempt for people at its basis had at last shown itself to be so inefficient it could no longer work. Siegel defined contempt as “the addition to self through the lessening of something else.” And he also explained so importantly: “If people really cared that poverty not be, it wouldn’t be. But once you can feel you’re superior by thinking others are poorer than you are, it will be.”

The idea that people can’t have a decent place to live unless someone can make profit from them is immoral. Recently, I attended an event that should have been reported on the front pages of every major newspaper: a seminar titled “Housing: A Basic Right, An Urgent Need, an Architectural Priority” at the American Institute of Architects national convention in Philadelphia. It featured the powerful public service film against homelessness and hunger “What Does a Person Deserve?” by Emmy award winning filmmaker Ken Kimmelman, based on this fundamental ethical question asked by Eli Siegel: “What does a person deserve by being alive?”

The honest answering of this question by everyone—every city council member, mayor, and government official in every city in America—will end homelessness. That film ends with these words by Siegel: “The world should be owned by the people living in it. Every person should be seen as living in a world truly his. All persons should be seen as living in a world truly theirs.”

Nancy Huntting is a writer and teacher at the nonprofit Aesthetic Realism Foundation in New York City, AestheticRealism.org.